Monday, March 28, 2005

BrainGate plugs brains into computers - (United Press International)

BrainGate plugs brains into computers - (United Press International):



Foxborough, MA, Mar. 20 (UPI) -- A Foxborough, Mass., company has developed technology that plugs a human brain into a desktop computer, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems has developed BrainGate, a product aimed at enabling quadriplegics to do things like surf the Web, write e-mails, play video games and operate TV remotes and telephones just by thinking.

'We can take someone's thought and put it on a screen,' said Tim Surgenor, chief executive of Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, manufacturer of the device, which is called BrainGate Neural Interface System.

BrainGate has already been tested on one person, and the Food and Drug Administration has given Cyberkinetics permission to test the technology on four other quadriplegics.

The system requires a surgeon to drill a hole in the patient's head and implant a chip on the surface of the brain area responsible for moving arms and hands."

Sunday, March 27, 2005

WTF?

Ok... so, I have nothing fun to say. does that make me a prude?... the judges say, "Yes!"

Friday, March 18, 2005

Mozillasoft Firenet Explofox?!

Microsoft Internet Explorer 7.0 Details Begin to Leak
By Mary Jo Foley

The first beta of IE 7.0 isn't expected for a few more months. But information on Microsoft's security, standards and interface plans are trickling out now.

Since it first revealed a month ago that it was pulling a U-turn by releasing a new version of Internet Explorer independent of Longhorn, Microsoft has been unwilling to share many particulars about its forthcoming browser.

Will Internet Explorer (IE) 7.0 have tabs? Will it comply with the Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) 2.0 standard? Exactly how will it make browsing more secure? Will it ship in 2005?

Microsoft's answers? No comment.

Microsoft has shared publicly that IE 7.0 will be focused primarily on improving security. Company officials said recently that Microsoft plans to make IE 7.0 available to Windows XP Service Pack 2, Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 and Windows XP Professional x64 users. A first beta of IE 7.0 is due out this summer.

But Microsoft is sharing quite a bit more IE 7.0 specifics privately with key partners, sources who requested anonymity claim.

Sources say that IE 7.0 – which is code-named "Rincon," they hear – will be a tabbed browser.

IE 7.0 will feature international domain name (IDN) support; transparent Portable Network Graphics (PNG) support, which will allow for the display of overlayed images in the browser; and new functionality that will simplify printing from inside IE 7.0, partner sources said. The new browser also will likely include a built-in news aggregator.

(Coincidentally, or perhaps not, MSN just began testing a new Microsoft-developed RSS aggregator.)

Among the myriad security enhancements Microsoft is expecting to include in IE 7.0, according to partner sources:

# reduced privilege mode becomes the default;
# no cross-domain scripting and/or scripting access;
# improved Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) user interface;
# possible integration between IE 7.0 and Microsoft's Windows anti-spyware service, which currently is in beta.

* MSN Quietly Tests an RSS Aggregator
* Netscape 8.0 Supports Both IE and Gecko Engines
* Microsoft Lets Loose a Few More IE 7.0 Tidbits
* Microsoft Changes Course: New Standalone IE for XP Planned
* Firefox Still Gaining on IE

Partner sources say Microsoft is wavering on the extent to which it plans to support CSS2 with IE 7.0. Developers have been clamoring for Microsoft to update its CSS support to support the latest W3C standards for years. But Microsoft is leaning toward adding some additional CSS2 support to IE 7.0, but not embracing the standard in its entirety, partners say.

St. Paddys Day Parade

This is straight from the log book ........
3/13/05
Rm 253 called down around 2am screaming about 255 that they were banging on the walls and yelling and screaming ... B and I went up to ask them to calm down.. Mr. noname immediatly became rude and beligerant telling us to prove he was being loud... "we" heard enough while waiting for them to hear us knocking on the door ... We asked nicely three times for them to just keep it down .. He then threatened us ... We called the police... He was asked to leave ... As the police where in the lobby they came back in the front door yelling at the police . The Police told them leave or be arrested they left ... Then his mother called "drunk" and told me i was screwed because she knows someone that works here and i hope i dont like my job ..... I proceded to tell her , her son is an adult there were several complaints about the room and all we asked was for him to keep it down .. He refused ....I asked her if she would like to speak to an officer and she hung up .....
hopefully an hour later The end
3:10 am Mr Noname called and called me a cocksucker and B a Motherfucker and said he was coming to kick our asses . I handed the phone to an officer he hung up ..
3:15 am The Girls mother calls and asks what was going on i told her the problem was between her daughter and her boyfriend and the police now she said she wasnt ok with that I told her I wasnt ok with him calling and telling me he was going to hurt us ... I said if you like you can speak to an officer there still here ! she hung up

The End
Welcome To My Life

Thursday, March 10, 2005

BetaNews | Microsoft Details Next Generation Xbox

BetaNews | Microsoft Details Next Generation Xbox:



Microsoft Details Next Generation Xbox
By David Worthington, BetaNews
March 9, 2005, 7:33 PM

For the first time, Microsoft has highlighted details of its second-generation Xbox gaming console. Microsoft describes the platform as a balance of hardware, services and software to meet the demands of the high definition (HD) era of gaming.

Customers that purchase the new console can expect to encounter a revamped Xbox guide where they create their own profiles, have in-game playlists, and can access the Xbox Live service, as well as a 'marketplace' to purchase custom add-ons for games. Software and services will be coupled with more than a teraflop of computing power for gaming and entertainment purposes.

Profiles called 'Gamer Cards' are at-a-glance contact cards for Xbox Live that share information about skills, interests and lifestyles to build up a community around the Xbox.

The community will have its own system of commerce with a browseable micro-transaction service that will permit users to scour through a catalog of user-created bonus levels, maps, weapons, vehicles, skins and more. Users can also personalize their gaming experience free of cost with a playlist system for setting custom music in games.

Whether or not gamers choose to swap tracks, customization is the watchword at Redmond. Microsoft has tailored the new Xbox for HD gaming with a custom-designed graphics processor co-developed with ATI Technologies and worked with IBM to design a multi-core processor architecture with 'developer headroom' for the HD era.

Multi-core processors can segregate tasks, making the Xbox's resources available to more than one user at any given time. For instance, Intel's new Pentium D processor supports simultaneous game play and digital media playback.

Another standard Xbox feature will be multi-channel, positional audio fidelity for true surround sound.

'In the HD Era the platform is bigger than the processor,' said Microsoft Corporate Vice President and Chief XNA Architect J Allard. 'New technology and emerging consumer forces will come together to enable the rock stars of game development to shake up the old establishment and redefine entertainment as we know it.'

Despite all the front-end work, Microsoft did not forget the developers. The company recently announced a new software development kit called XNA Studio to streamline game development. The SDK uses familiar collaboration tools that are found in Visual Studio. Xbox developers may create games using DirectX, PIX, XACT technologies"

Tuesday, March 08, 2005

Google Desktop Search 1.0

"Google moves its desktop search tool out of beta, formally launching version 1.0 with support for more browsers and file types and better protection of sensitive documents."
By Antone Gonsalves
TechWeb News



Google Inc. on Monday moved its desktop search tool out of beta, formally launching version 1.0 with support for more browsers and file types and better protection of sensitive documents.

Available for free download, Google Desktop Search improves upon the beta version with the ability to search over the full text of PDF files and the meta-information stored with music, image and video files.

In addition, the software supports Firefox and Netscape browsers, as well as Thunderbird and Netscape e-mail clients. The search tool is also available in Chinese and Korean languages.

In formally releasing its product, Google jumps ahead of rivals Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc., which have similar free products still in beta. The companies, however, have taken slightly different approaches.

Microsoft's desktop search is part of its MSN Toolbar Suite, which also provides web search, a pop-up ad blocker and other capabilities. The tool is installed in Outlook, the Windows taskbar, Windows Explorer and Internet Explorer. Yahoo, on the other hand, is developing its tool through a partnership with desktop-search specialist X1 Technologies Inc.

America Online Inc. has announced plans for releasing a desktop search tool, licensing the technology from Copernic Technologies Inc. No release date has been set.

The interest in desktop search among the four web portal giants stems from the fact that most people looking to buy or research products on the web head to a search engine first, analysts say. Tying a person's PC to a shopping and entertainment portal through a desktop-search engine makes it more likely a shopper will start with that site.

The fact that Google is developing its product in-house while some of its other rivals are using partners indicates the level of importance Google has placed on desktop search, Whit Andrews, analyst for Gartner Inc. said. Using its own developers, Google can move quickly in adding features to meet changes in the market.

'This is something that Google is clearly treating as strategic,' Andrews said. 'We have to see (search) as Google's reason to exist. Anything that is search-related is part of the Google DNA.'

Along with searching files and e-mail, Google Desktop Search also indexes all the web pages a person has viewed and places them in a cache on the PC's hard drive. In addition, the application enables users to block secure web pages, such as those used in online banking, and to exclude all password-protected Microsoft Word and Excel documents.

For developers, Google has provided application-programming interfaces for developing applications that leverage the search product. Google also provides plug-ins that add more capabilities to the product, such as searching the full-text of scanned images, such as faxes.

Google Desktop Search is available as a floating box that can be placed anywhere on a user's desktop.

Beyond competing for consumers with its portal rivals, Google's new product, as well as those from competitors, is a potential threat to makers of desktop search products for the enterprise, Andrews said. Those companies include ISYS Search Software, DTSearch Corp. and Enfish Software.

Those companies offer many features unavailable in consumer products, such as index management, interface customization, beefed-up security and a more robust search engine, Andrews said. Nevertheless, these companies do not have the brand recognition of Google, and are unknown to many corporations. The fact that Google is free is also a big draw.

"Enterprises would probably consider (Google) because they just don't know of an alternative," Andrews said.

Google Desktop Search is available for Windows XP and Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 and above.

Sunday, March 06, 2005

NASA STUDY SUGGESTS GIANT SPACE CLOUDS ICED EARTH COULD The Day After Tomorrow BE RIGHT ??

Nasa News Stories Archive

March 5, 2005
NASA STUDY SUGGESTS GIANT SPACE CLOUDS ICED EARTH

Eons ago, giant clouds in space may have led to global extinctions, according to two recent technical papers supported by NASA’s Astrobiology Institute.

One paper outlines a rare scenario in which Earth iced over during snowball glaciations, after the solar system passed through dense space clouds. In a more likely scenario, less dense giant molecular clouds may have enabled charged particles to enter Earth’s atmosphere, leading to destruction of much of the planet’s protective ozone layer. This resulted in global extinctions, according to the second paper. Both recently appeared in the Geophysical Research Letters.

“Computer models show dramatic climate change can be caused by interstellar dust accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere during the solar system’s immersion into a dense space cloud,” said Alex Pavlov, principal author of the two papers. He is a scientist at the University of Colorado, Boulder. The resulting dust layer hovering over the Earth would absorb and scatter solar radiation, yet allow heat to escape from the planet into space, causing runaway ice buildup and snowball glaciations.

“There are indications from 600 to 800 million years ago that at least two of four glaciations were snowball glaciations. The big mystery revolves around how they are triggered,” Pavlov said. He concluded the snowball glaciations covered the entire Earth. His work is supported by the NASA Astrobiology Institute, which has offices at NASA Ames Research Center, located in California’s Silicon Valley.

Pavlov said this hypothesis has to be tested by geologists. They would look at Earth’s rocks to find layers that relate to the snowball glaciations to assess whether uranium 235 is present in higher amounts. It cannot be produced naturally on Earth or in the solar system, but it is constantly produced in space clouds by exploding stars called supernovae.

Sudden, small changes in the uranium 235/238-ratio in rock layers would be proof interstellar material is present that originated from supernovae. Collisions of the solar system with dense space clouds are rare, but according to Pavlov’s research, more frequent solar system collisions, with moderately dense space clouds, can be devastating. He outlined a complex series of events that would result in loss of much of Earth’s protective ozone layer, if the solar system collided with a moderately dense space cloud.

The research outlined a scenario that begins as Earth passes through a moderately dense space cloud that cannot compress the outer edge of the sun’s heliosphere into a region within the Earth’s orbit. The heliosphere is the expanse that begins at the sun’s surface and usually reaches far past the orbits of the planets. Because it remains beyond Earth’s orbit, the heliosphere continues to deflect dust particles away from the planet.

However, because of the large flow of hydrogen from space clouds into the sun’s heliosphere, the sun greatly increases its production of electrically charged cosmic rays from the hydrogen particles. This also increases the flow of cosmic rays towards Earth. Normally, Earth’s magnetic field and ozone layer protect life from cosmic rays and the sun’s dangerous ultraviolet radiation.

Moderately dense space clouds are huge, and the solar system could take as long as 500,000 years to cross one of them. Once in such a cloud, the Earth would be expected to undergo at least one magnetic reversal. During a reversal, electrically charged cosmic rays can enter Earth’s atmosphere instead of being deflected by the planet’s magnetic field.

Cosmic rays can fly into the atmosphere and break up nitrogen molecules to form nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxide catalysts would set off the destruction of as much as 40 percent of the protective ozone in the planet’s upper atmosphere across the globe and destruction of about 80 percent of the ozone over the polar regions according to Pavlov.

###
Contacts:

John Bluck
NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.

Saturday, March 05, 2005

Rebuilding the Tower of Babel..

BetaNews | Intel Talks Up 'Humanized' Computing:




"Intel Talks Up 'Humanized' Computing
By Ed Oswald, BetaNews
March 4, 2005, 12:36 PM

While it may seem like something out of Star Trek, imagine being able to talk on the phone with someone who does not understand English - yet will hear it spoken in his or her native tongue because the phone automatically translates speech into the necessary language. Chipmaker Intel sees it happening within the next decade.

In a keynote address at the Intel Developer Forum, Justin Rattner, director of Intel's corporate technology group, told attendees that much of the company's recent moves are to prepare for these types of tasks, which will require much more computing power than is available today.

'To deliver these capabilities in products that are easy to use and attractive to many people requires that we, as an industry, rethink our approach to platform development,' he argued.

Intel recently has begun to look towards multiple-core processors that will offer supercomputer-like performance in a small form factor like today's computers. Having multiple cores within a processor is like adding more 'brains' to allow the computer to handle several complex applications at once without degradation in performance.

The company has also begun to look into silicon photonics technology, in which lasers are used within silicon to transport data from one place to another very quickly. The new approach removes the need for today's copper wires that have performance limitations and could stunt processor speed growth in the future.

As well as working on the hardware side of things, Intel is also developing software to ensure its new and future lines of processors are able to handle a large number of simultaneous tasks, which will be necessary to make these more 'humanized' applications possible.

'At Intel our research focus is all about making technology more valuable and useful for people,' Rattner told the audience. 'With the increased capabilities and opportunities we're developing in our labs combined with the company's platform focus, this is an extremely exciting time to be an Intel researcher working with the industry to create the future.'"

Thursday, March 03, 2005

The FCC Will Fine Howard Stern 500,000 Dollars For using A Word But Killing Bald Eagles Is Cheap

First I will rant then read below.... So.... I could kill 100 bald eagles to get penalized the amount of money recently set against Howard stern in the amount of 500 thousand dollars ??? WTF ????? Somewhere somehow this madness has to stop this is completely ridiculous .. What has become of this country where when we hear one word we will fine that amount but if you kill a national treasure and I believe an endangered species you only pay 5000 dolllars ???? I Want the crack the FCC is smoking this is possibly one of the sadest uses ever for my tax money and the peoples time... I have a better idea.... A 500,000 dollar fine to every government employee who wastes tax payer money and time on crazy laws and legislation...... Like take for instance freedom fries Perhaps we should charge 1 million dollars everytime some dumbass congressman or woman wastes Americas time with stuff like that.....Seriously we pay for that stuff !!!!!!! What happened to my country ?? Home Of The Free Land Of The Brave ..... Doesnt seem to free any more ..............

Man Sentenced in Bald Eagle Killing, Reports U.S. Attorney: "United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan and Thomas J. Healy, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Office of Law Enforcement, announced that JOSEPH DONOHUE, age 79, of 82 Fort Hill Road, Pittsfield, Massachusetts, was ordered by U.S. District Judge Michael A. Ponsor to pay a $5,000 fine. In imposing the fine, $2,000 more than requested by the prosecutor, Judge Ponsor referred to the death of the young eagle as a 'tragedy.' Judge Ponsor also ordered that DONOHUE be banned from hunting for a period of two years."

Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Super String Theory At Last !!!! Could There Finally Be A Way To Prove This Theory

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Click to enlarge
Credit: UC Davis

Could two lookalike galaxies, barely a whisker apart in the night sky, herald a revolution in our understanding of fundamental physics? Some physicists believe that the two galaxies are the same - its image has been split into two, they maintain, by a "cosmic string"; a San Andreas Fault in the very fabric of space and time.

If this interpretation is correct, then CSL-1 - the name of the curious double galaxy - is the first concrete evidence for "superstring theory": the best candidate for a "theory of everything", which attempts to encapsulate all the phenomena of nature in one neat set of equations.

Superstring theory views the fundamental building blocks of all matter - the electrons and quarks that make up the atoms in our bodies - as ultra- tiny pieces of vibrating "string". And, just as different vibrations of a violin string correspond to different musical notes, different vibrations of this fundamental string correspond to different fundamental particles.

The problem with string theory is that the strings are fantastically smaller than atoms and, therefore, impossible to detect in any conceivable laboratory experiment. But recently, physicists realised that the extreme conditions that existed in the early universe could have spawned enormously big strings. It is one of these "cosmic superstrings" that some believe is passing between the Earth and CSL- 1, and, in the process, creating the curious double image of the galaxy.

The realisation that big strings are possible has come from exploring the most esoteric implications of the theory. For instance, the only way strings can vibrate in enough different ways to mimic all the known fundamental particles is if the strings vibrate in a space-time of 10 dimensions.

Since we appear to live in a universe with a mere four dimensions - three of space and one of time - string theorists have been forced to postulate the existence of six extra space dimensions "rolled up" so small we have overlooked them.

The existence of the extra dimensions opens up the possibility of more complex objects. In addition to strings, which extend in only one dimension, it is possible to have objects with two, three or more dimensions. These are dubbed branes, or p-branes, where the "p" denotes the number of their dimensions.

This has raised the possibility that our universe is a three- brane - a three- dimensional "island", adrift in a 10-dimensional space. And, if it is, it may not be alone. Some have suggested that the big bang was caused when another brane collided with our own 13.7 billion years ago (See "Highly strung", The Independent, 7 July 2004).

Crucially, a collision between branes creates strings - both within each brane and as a kind of spaghetti connecting the branes. And these can be stretched to cosmic dimensions to make cosmic superstrings. "Cosmic strings turn out to be pretty much inevitable in the brane scenario," says Tom Kibble of Imperial College in London.

Cosmic superstrings would be under enormous tension, like a geological fault in the Earth's crust. But, being free to move, they would attempt to relieve the tension by lashing about through space at almost the speed of light. But their most interesting property is the effect they have on their surroundings. "A string distorts the space around it in a very distinctive way," says Kibble.

One way to visualise this is to imagine a string coming up through this page. Imagine cutting from the paper a narrow triangle whose tip is at the string, then gluing the paper back together again. The result will be a shallow cone centred on the string.

Because of this distortion of space, if a string passes between us and a distant galaxy - a giant collection of stars like our Milky Way - the light of the galaxy can come to Earth along two possible routes: one on either side of the string. Consequently, there will be two identical images of the galaxy only a whisker apart - which is exactly what is seen in the case of CSL-1.

CSL-1 was discovered by a team led by Mikhail Sazhin of Capodimonte Astronomical Observatory in Naples and the Sternberg Astronomical Institute in Moscow. They christened it Capodimonte- Sternberg Lens Candidate 1, which is where the CSL-1 comes from. "It looks like the signature of a string to me," says Kibble. "However, it is always possible we are seeing two galaxies that just happen to look surprisingly similar." This is the view of the sceptics. "CSL- 1 is most likely just a pair of galaxies that happened to be close together on the sky," says Abraham Loeb of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics. "We know of many close pairs of galaxies in the local universe, including our own Milky Way and Andromeda." But others are keeping their fingers crossed that Loeb is wrong. "I am hoping nature won't have played such a trick on us," says Tanmay Vachaspati of Case Western Reserve University in Ohio.

If CSL-1 was the only piece of evidence for a cosmic superstring it might be easy to brush it under the carpet. But it isn't. There is the "double quasar" Q0957+561A,B. Discovered at Jodrell Bank near Manchester in 1979, the two images of a super-bright galaxy, or quasar, are formed by a galaxy lying between the quasar and the Earth.

The gravity of the intervening galaxy bends the light of the quasar so that it follows two distinct paths to Earth, creating two images of unequal brightness. Crucially, the two light paths are of different lengths and so the light takes a different time to travel along each. In fact, astronomers find that when one image brightens, the other image brightens 417.1 days later.

But this is not what has been found by a team of astronomers from the US and the Ukraine, led by Rudolph Schild of the Harvard- Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics. When they studied the two images, they noticed that, between September 1994 and July 1995, the two images brightened and faded at the same time - with no time delay The two images did this four times, on each occasion for a period of about 100 days.

The only way Schild and his colleagues can make sense of this behaviour is if, between September 1994 and July 1995, something moved across our line of sight to the quasar, simultaneously affecting the light coming down both paths to the Earth. The only thing that fits the bill, they claim, is a vibrating loop of cosmic string moving across the line of sight at about 70 per cent of the speed of light.

To oscillate once every 100 days or so, the loop has to be very small - no bigger than 1 per cent of the distance between the Sun and the nearest star. And Schild and his colleagues calculate that the string must be remarkably close to us - well within our Milky Way galaxy.

Most physicists remain sceptical about the evidence for cosmic superstrings. If the case is to be strengthened, it will be necessary to find more candidates like CSL-1 and Q0957+561A,B. Alternatively, it will be necessary to detect the "gravitational waves" coming from a string. These are ripples in the fabric of space, much like the ripples which spread out on a pond from an impacting raindrop.

Strings are travelling very fast. If they get a kink in them, it is possible for this part of the string to crack like a whip. The part producing the crack travels at almost the speed of light and should produce an intense burst of gravitational waves. As first pointed out by Thibault Damour of the Institut des Hautes etudes Scientifiques in Paris and Alex Vilenkin of Tufts Institute of Cosmology in the US, such signals could be detected in the next few years by Europe's Virgo detector or America's Laser Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Observatory.

String theory has long been criticised as that which makes no observable predictions about the universe we live in. If the discovery of cosmic superstrings holds up, the theory may finally have connected with reality and the critics may at last be silenced.

Marcus Chown is the author of `The Universe Next Door' (Headline)

Source: Independent, The; London (UK)